Privatization and Nationalization Cycles

نویسندگان

  • Roberto Chang
  • Constantino Hevia
  • Norman Loayza
چکیده

This paper studies the cycles of nationalization and privatization in resource-rich economies as a prime instance of unstable institutional reform. We discuss available evidence on the drivers and consequences of privatization and nationalization, reviewing the existing literature and presenting illustrative case studies. This leads to the main contribution of the paper: a static and dynamic model of the choice between private and national regimes for the ownership of natural resources. In the model, the basic tradeo¤ is given by equality (national ownership) versus e¢ ciency (private ownership). The connection between resource ownership and the equality-e¢ ciency tradeo¤ is given by the incentives for e¤ort that each regime elicits from workers. The resolution of the tradeo¤ depends on external and domestic conditions that a¤ect the value of social welfare under each regime. We discuss how external conditions –such as the commodity price–and domestic conditions –such as the tax system– a¤ect the choice of private vs. national regimes. In particular, we identify the determinants of the observed cycles of privatization and nationalization. 0For excellent research assistance, we are grateful to Luis Fernando Castro, Teresa Fort, and Tomoko Wada. We also thank Yuki Ikeda for editorial assistance. We have bene…tted from insightful conversations and comments from Ximena Del Carpio and Luis Servén.We gratefully recognize the …nancial support from the World Bank’s Knowledge for Change Program and the Latin America and Caribbean Flagship Report on “The Role of Commodities.”The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors, and do not necessarily re‡ect those of the World Bank, their Boards of Directors, or the countries they represent.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Against the mainstream: Nazi privatization in 1930s Germany1

Nationalization was particularly important in the early 1930s in Germany.The state took over a large industrial concern, large commercial banks, and other minor firms. In the mid-1930s, the Nazi regime transferred public ownership to the private sector. In doing so, they went against the mainstream trends in western capitalistic countries, none of which systematically reprivatized firms during ...

متن کامل

Reality versus propaganda in the formation of beliefs about privatization

Argentina privatized most public utilities during the 1990’s but re-nationalized the main water company in 2006. We study beliefs about the benefits of the privatization of water services amongst low and middle income groups immediately after the 2006 nationalization. Negative opinions about the privatization prevail. These are particularly strong amongst households that did not benefit from pr...

متن کامل

British Re - Nationalization and Regulation : the Government ' S Liability to Shareholders *

During the 1980s, Margaret Thatcher transformed the political and economic agenda of Great Britain. Emphasizing the traditional values of economic liberalism, Thatcher limited the role of the state in the economy and reduced the influence of trade unions. Privatizing many of its nationalized industries, the British Government sold off most of its shares in numerous industries, including British...

متن کامل

Emerging Market Fluctuations: the Role of Interest Rates and Productivity Shocks

Business cycles in emerging markets are characterized by high levels of volatility in income, investment, and net exports. Consumption is more volatile than income, and net exports are highly countercyclical (see Aguiar and Gopinath, 2007). Furthermore, the interest rates faced by these economies are highly volatile and negatively correlated with income, as described in Neumeyer and Perri (2005...

متن کامل

How party nationalization conditions economic voting

In this article we analyze the conditioning effect of party nationalization, and in particular dynamic nationalization, on economic voting. While previous single-country and cross-national studies suggest a weak correlation between economic conditions and voting patterns, we argue that this relationship is conditioned by the degree to which parties are dynamically nationalized. Using both case ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009